Tuesday saw the Federal High Court in Lagos set aside a decision in a lawsuit brought against Anuoluwapo Adepoju, a surgeon who is currently on trial for allegedly botched buttock enlargement operations.
The Federal Competition and Consumers Protection Commission (FCCPC) hauled Adepoju into court.
Along with her clinic, MedContour Services Ltd., she is facing five counts of charges that revolve around her allegedly refusing to accept an invitation for an inquiry into issues following body surgery.
On July 17, 2020, she was re-arrested with her medical attire,
Tuesday was set aside for the ruling by Justice Mohammed Liman following the adoption of each party’s final speeches in November 2023.
But the judgment was not ready on Tuesday as earlier scheduled, and the court informed parties that a new date will be communicated to parties soon.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the defendant is charged by the Federal Competition and Consumers Protection Commission (FCCPC).
She had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was granted bail on self recognition.
Justice Liman was however, subsequently, transferred out of the Lagos Division of the court, but he still presides over the case on a fiat.
Trial commenced in the suit with the prosecution calling several witnesses, and thereafter closed its case
The defence on its part, filed a no case submission on grounds that no case had been established against the defendant by the prosecution to warrant her entering her defence.
Justice Liman had in a ruling delivered on April 7, 2022 rejected the no case submission filed by the defendant.
Liman had ruled that the evidence so far tendered before the court, satisfies the elements of the criminal charges pending against her.
The court had, consequently, ordered the defendant to open her defence.
The case however, suffered several adjournments on different dates, for various reasons.
On May 5, 2023, the defence began defence and called the first defendant as sole witness.
The defendant was led in evidence and also cross examined after which the court adjourned the case until June 21, 2023, for adoption of written addresses.
On June 21, 2023 the court did not sit and the case was then adjourned until July 17, 2023, and again adjourned until Oct. 24, 2023, and then Nov. 20, 2023.
On Nov. 20, 2023, the adoption of addresses by counsel was held virtually and judgment fixed for Jan. 23 (today)
A new date for judgment will now be communicated to parties.
In the five-counts charge brought against the defendants, the prosecution alleged that the first defendant failed to appear before the FCCPC in relation to investigation into a reported failed buttocks enlargement surgery.
The defendant was accused of neglecting to comply with the summons issued by the Commission on April 15, 2020.
The prosecution further claimed that the first defendant failed to disclose documents that were requested of her in accordance with the Commission’s notice of investigation dated April 14, 2020, and refused to do so without a valid reason.
It was claimed that the defendant hindered and stopped the Commission from conducting its inquiry into the relevant matter.
According to the state, the offense violates the FCCPC Act of 2018’s sections 11(1)(a), 33(1)(a), 110, 113(1)(a), and 159(4).
